Why have international organizations remained silent?
Nasser Imani - New developments in Syria, particularly in the military and security spheres, are attributed to the Zionist regime's assaults on the country and its passage through the Golan Heights. In this context, a few things must be taken into account.
First, the Zionist regime has a lengthy history of attacking other nations' autonomous military installations. The June 1981 bombing of the nuclear reactor at Osirak in Iraq is a well-known event. In the face of the flagrant hostility, no nation, institution, or international organization took action. This criterion also applies to Syria today, where Zionist aggression against Syrian territorial integrity has resulted in unjustified silence and passivity from international institutions.
When a nation or actor is experiencing a crisis, the Zionist authority steps in and establishes policies to capitalize on those uncertain circumstances. This presumption forces us to consider the current developments in Syria (after the fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime in Damascus) and the Zionist response to this crisis.
The Zionist authority is attempting to take advantage of the ambiguity, uncertainty, and void in Syria, where we are not seeing the development of a government and state. The clear objective of Tel Aviv's activity is to ensure that the government that is constituted in Syria as a political and official actor lacks the infrastructure and military capabilities necessary to effectively challenge the Zionist state.
The silence of organizations and even other nations over the Zionist regime's blatant and indefensible attack against Syrian territory, however, is currently the most pressing issue. We have seen a sort of impudence on the side of Tel Aviv in recent days, as a result of the ongoing strikes and bombings of Syria's military installations and infrastructure in the Golan and other parts of the country. Other institutions and nations do not have plans to contain this impudence, despite the fact that it is unprecedented.
It appears that the majority of the region's nations are insensitive to the Zionist regime's movements in Syria's strategic depths. No legal framework can excuse the inaction and apathy of regional and trans regional governments as well as international organizations. This is an instance of brutality that has not been seen since the turn of the century.
The many and disgruntled spectators of recent events in Syria and the area complain about the inefficiency of international institutions in the face of Zionist atrocities and recurrent aggressions. These multinational organizations' operations need to be fundamentally revised. These organizations' primary role and obligation of safeguarding the privacy of nations and territories must be the focus of this evaluation and revision.