صفحه نخست

Multimedia

Photo

Iran

Human Rights

World

Report

Notes

Interview

صفحات داخلی

The biggest strategic mistake of the enemies in Syria

۰۸ اسفند ۲۰۲۴ - ۱۷:۵۳:۰۰
News ID: ۶۶
دسته بندی‌: home ، General
All brigades and battalions of the Assad regime's army in southern Syria have been methodically destroyed by the Zionist regime since the end of Bashar al-Assad's rule.

Additionally, all air defense systems, missile depots, development and manufacturing factories, and any location where the Assad regime participated, produced, passed through, or produced weapons have been specifically targeted.

However, in order to stop rebels and opposition groups from being present close to the Syrian border and the occupied territories, the occupying regime has established communication with the leaders of the Tahrir al-Sham Front. There is no doubt that the Zionist regime is attempting to take advantage of Syria's precarious situation. The same circumstance that it helped to create. Nonetheless, there are unquestionably worries and concerns in Tel Aviv (about the Syrian situation).

Although the Western and Zionist media are constantly and exaggeratedly praising some of the pieces in the game in Syria and, on the other hand, are trying to portray the Syrian nation and the opponents of the occupying regime as absolute losers and defeated, beyond this equation, some prominent and fundamental concerns have emerged in Washington and Tel Aviv and have occupied the minds of their senior strategists.
The future of the current war scene is the subject of the first worry. What assurance is there, first and foremost, that the armed groups fighting Bashar al-Assad will continue to dominate Hama, Idlib, Aleppo, and the countryside of Aleppo? Stated differently, the Zionist regime and the West are unsure of the precise date on which their pieces' dominance over the points they currently control will end. This equation can be altered instantly by a shift in the metatext of the conflict in West Asia or even by the occurrence of some unforeseen field events.

Key and strategic areas in Syria were repeatedly taken over and liberated by the enemy during the bloody events that occurred between 2013 and 2018 with the help of ISIS and terrorist organizations connected to the US and the Zionist regime! Senior American and Zionist analysts have cautioned against the two Democratic and Republican parties' erroneous optimism about recent events.

The nature of the opposition groups and their potential to defy their original owners are the second area of concern for the US and the occupying regime. Western intelligence and military institutions have frequently viewed this issue as a security proposition, arguing that terrorist-takfiri groups have a finite lifespan and that their capacity to rebel against Zionist and Western sources is enhanced when their presence in a region declines.

Their third worry centers on the antagonistic relationships that exist between their affiliated armed groups. Forces connected to the Free Army, the SDF, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, and the Kurds who oppose the Syrian government have turned against one another in a number of instances in recent days, and conflicts have arisen between them over the occupations. Although the Western media and propaganda strategy, the occupying regime, and other Assad opponents aim to decentralize these conflicts, it should not be overlooked that these conflicts will eventually be made public by regional developments.

The implications of the recent events in Syria for other regional cases are the fourth and final issue. The global public is aware of the interconnectedness and continuity of the current events in Iraq, Gaza, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, and... There will undoubtedly be costs and repercussions for Washington and Tel Aviv, the two primary directors of recent developments, if Syria is turned into a scorched earth (from the viewpoint of the West and the occupying regime) or if ongoing, erosive conflicts occur there.

Some of these effects are susceptible to the principle of surprise and have the potential to make the void left by the official Syrian government's dominance a vulnerability rather than an asset for the occupiers and their allies. Events in the field of international relations can occur quickly, but this does not necessarily mean that they can be controlled, as demonstrated by past and present developments.


ارسال دیدگاه
دیدگاهتان را بنویسید
نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *
{_form_lable_comment_captcha}
{_form_elemenet_comment_captcha}